Thursday, September 1, 2011

An essay about Love and why people work so hard to deny it…


<big>Recently I have been pondering a curious behavior that occurs when a relationship reaches that inevitable point that it begins to generate friction between what seemed to be perfectly matched parts. If you look at the scope and depth of the bonds created by love it seems natural to assume that a little friction would pose no significant threat to the stability and integrity of such powerful bonds. And if logic were the prevailing decision making methodology, I believe that would be a very safe assumption to make. However… </big>

The relationships I am referring to are the ones where two people shared meaningful, honest feelings with each other over a significant period of time. It has been my experience directly as well as observing indirectly, that two people who genuinely loved one another will not naturally “fall out of love” with each other unless some form of direct action is taken by one or both people. By that I mean if a relationship ends and each person goes his or her separate ways the love they once shared will not die. It will certainly diminish in its intensity and immediate importance but without some added influence it will not disappear or fade away into non existence. It will wait patiently and without complaint wherever it is set and just exist. If you find yourself thinking of the other person or interacting with them you will find it readily accessible and often times a source of comfort and reassurance later down the road.

I have also noticed in relationships where one or even both people later proclaim they no longer love or care for the other, often times expressed in terms of resentment, bitterness and even open hostility and hatred. It has been my observation that the people who make this claim have all progressed through a period where they actively expend time and effort to devalue and discredit the foundations and experiences that transpired during the formation of their love for each other. This personal campaign of hate and anger is nicely packaged up as victimized self pity and helplessness. The unspoken hinge pin behind this campaign is that everyone, including the campaigner themselves, was too dim witted to pickup on any of these monumental and quite numerous, character flaws of their former lover who now wholeheartedly (and apparently quite obviously) epitomizes evil - mind, body and soul. I know they say love is blind, but what are they saying about the rest of us unfettered by any such emotional attachment? How many of you can think of a friend who is even now in the midst of this very thing. The friend who after a breakup with someone they were deeply in love with and from whom their love was strongly reciprocated, can be seen and heard preaching the shortcomings and flaws of this person they were once so in love with. The effort expended in this campaign is to convince themselves and anyone who will listen, that it was a false love, that it is now meaningless and no longer even exists. Sadly, more often than not, this is also more effort than the campaigner ever expended on identifying this Judas prior to their recent epiphany.

You are now to believe that the happiness and joy you witnessed with your own eyes was all part of a clever deception perpetrated by this evil person. Stick around a minute longer and you will be inundated with a virtual smorgasbord of "facts" and reasons and even a few secrets, only just now revealed to the public, to support campaign agenda. As long as your not one of those left wing extremists that checks sources or one of those opinionated jerks that thinks for yourself (only selfish people do that you know) then you should be well on your way to trading in your worly wealth for a nice sheet and shaving your head. If they can convince a perfect stranger of their former lovers evil intent then surely there must be some merit to their words. As they perfect and tailor their campaign agenda over countless retellings they begin to delude themselves into thinking there was no love to lose or what was there was tainted and impure or my personal favorite that they were controlled into thinking they were in love therefore justifying their illogical leap into the abyss. It has always struck me as odd that their actions disprove their own words. If they truly were without concern, without feeling, without caring or love, there would be no need of this campaign. People who dont care about an elections outcome dont become lobbyists. I often wonder if they realize how easily those of us on the outside see the effort for what it is. The thrashing of a person whose heart is heavy with pain and who now sees through eyes clouded by fear and their every insecurity. A pain so powerful and so terrifying it evokes an illogical emotional response that virtually eliminates the possibility of getting their pain healed. A pain that is often caused inadvertently or is the result of simple misunderstanding and rarely done with malicious intent to cause harm. Barriers are erected, traps are laid, lines are covertly redrawn and secret alliances formed (oh lets us not forget Facebook names are blocked and innocents defriended). In the mad rush to avoid being hurt further and exonerate themselves from any responsibility for the state of things they frantically set about laying the obstacles that will likely provide the spark that ignites a conflagration which left unchecked eventually consumes the relationship and leaves nothing but scorched earth and charred remains behind.

With out the ability to logically evaluate their actions they do not see that by isolating themselves from the one person who could put the brakes on their run away locomotive they more often than not take steps to ensure they remain inacessible. I was always under the impression that the outcome of a debate is based on the merits as presented by each side. Objective observers will notice the obvious absense of any other point of view but the one being pushed by the campainer. In their blind rush they lock that person out of their life, keeping them at bay with a relentless barrage of personal attacks, carefully constructed using an arsenal of the most private, personal information gathered at a time when the possibility of being on opposite sides seemed patently absurd. The result of this tragically faulty wiring within our human psyche is almost always the cold, calculated demise of something beautiful, love. And even then it often takes weeks or months of campaigning to stamp out the truth of their feelings, to harden their hearts, to convince themselves and with any luck their friends and a few random passers by, that this person they once proclaimed to love and cherish was really a creature intent on evil and enslaving them to their foul will. It frankly wouldn’t surprise me if the next evolution on the campaign trail are donations for their noble sacrifice in the face of such pitiless and unspeakable horrors.

What never ceases to amaze me is why you would bother doing it. If you have even a shred of self reflection, honesty or the common sense of a gumball you know that any campaign pitch, no matter how juicy it sounds, is still just a pitch. Created by design as an attempt to influence thoughts and events along in a course that best serves the campaigns agenda. Replacing love, even a love that may not have been viable because of individual differences with negativity and anger is just stupid. Why do we as a society find it easier to accept the loss of a love or the failure of a relationship if we can make the other person out to be at fault or of poor character. Was it not both people involved in the relationship, sharing equal credit for the happiness and success without even speaking of it… we as humans find it easy and almost natural to harmoniously bask in the joy of love, success and happiness. It almost makes us look like a kind, benevolent race of creatures at first glance. That is until the first bump in the road or a single misunderstanding balloons out of proportion. Next thing you know assumptions are being made, conclusion are being jumped too, past fears and insecurities are dusted off and given new life, every aspect of the relationship is reexamined and given a malevolent purpose, words spoken in trust and confidence are repeated to suit the mood and context of the accuser, strengths become weaknesses, beloved traits become damning character flaws and love slowly begins to look like hate. A war breaks out right smack in the middle of lovers lane. Next thing you know its a crime scene with police tape, chalk outlines, accusations most foul and charges of malcontent flying everywhere… Its a shame that we have the ability to experience such joy and happiness simply by sharing our time and experiences with another of our species just so we can run ourselves ragged with an almost zealous single minded determination to destroy it based on decisions that disregard the very things that made it notable to being with. We as a race are short sighted and in this day and age of prolific global communication the short comings of such poorly thought out decision making skills certainly become obvious in the trends we exhibit.

It seems to me this stems from a general lack of accepting responsibility for ones actions, both direct and indirect. And a complete failure to educate successive generations in the areas of interpersonal skill building and relationship management. The sum total of each generation seems to have been to find someone to blame thereby eliminating the need for personal growth or problem solving. Why try to improve oneself when its so obviously everyone elses problem. In this world of fly by night retirement funds and easy come easy go marriage we seem to be under the impression that everything is not only disposable but easily replaceable. It seems we are encouraged NOT to value anyone or anything past its first inconvenience or deviation from our demands and expectations of its use in fulfilling our immediate wants and needs. If something or someone does not perform as we require we get rid of it/them and look for a replacement. That works pretty well with electronics and automobiles but not so much with people… people require an investment of time and emotion, the longer the relationship the bigger the investment. Devaluing those investments, for any reason, should be something that is done with a great deal of consideration and thought. We would never manage our money in such a ridiculous way. I would not cast a favorite briefcase I had spent years filling with the fruits of my labors out the window just because of a broken latch… nor would I find getting a new briefcase a suitable replacement for the investment that was lost when the old one was discarded. But when it comes to relationships and the investments made in them we throw logic to the wind and make rash decisions based largely on raw, negative or hurtful emotions.
Emotion… the Exxon Valdez of investment advisors…
“The truth will set you free. But first, its going to piss you off.”
Love can be a very painful emotion when you find yourself trapped on the other side of that locked door… an enemy in what was once friendly territory. Assaulted by accusations that are so ridiculous on one hand as to almost be comical and yet so foul on the other as to leave you perpetually shaking your head in confusion trying to make sense of it all. The worst mistake you can make is to try defending yourself as this campaign has been well thought out and carefully tailored in expectation of your natural first instinct to being blindsided. My advice, take flight over fight. If you try to stand your ground unprepared you will likely lend credit to the cause that has been raised against you. There is little point in trying to convert a religious fanatic to atheism and there is little point trying to reason with someone who’s vision is clouded by anger and hate. It is my belief that it is all just an attempt to deny facing the feelings that accompany love, that go hand in hand with caring about another person at a level that yes, they can hurt you if they choose to do so. But why is it we always seem to gloss over the upside… for each cost there is a benefit and the benefit of risking being hurt is truly being loved and being able to love someone in return. It is hard to believe that someone could love you unconditionally, love not only your assets but your flaws and your shortcomings and accept you for who you are. Placing their faith in you to do the right thing by not only yourself but them as well. A scary proposition, more so in this world of easy come easy go values. Its little wonder that Love and Loyalty travel hand in hand. Embrace love where you find it, waste not your energy trying to deny it, better to spend your time basking in its glow than living in the shadow of its death.

Oh well… thanks for coming along…

to coin a phrase… that’s just my opinion, i could be wrong.

Monday, September 20, 2010

The Formula for a Happy Child - a great article

The Formula for a Happy Child

What makes a happy child?

Part of being a happy kid is having the ability to do well in school. If you have young children check out this great resource when you get a chance... Budding Scholars Educational Toys

Childhood Dependency Needs

·         Time
·         Attention
·         Affection
·         Direction
o    Guidance
o    Discipline
Children may not come with an owner's manual -- but if they did, the section on the happy child would not be very complicated because there is a simple formula...
·         Consistently met emotional dependency needs = a happy child.
Small children cannot meet their own needs, much like a plant cannot water itself. The happy child depends on his or her caretakers to meet these needs... As we grow we become more independent, increasingly able to meet our own needs.
There are two groups of dependency needs...
The first group is the survival needs - These are what Maslow calls the basic needs for food, shelter, clothing, medical attention, safety and protection. If these needs are not met, at least to a minimal degree, the child is likely to die.
Notice that the survival needs includes their need to feel safe and protected... If a child does not feel safe she cannot relax... She is always on guard, scanning her environment for danger...
Her anxiety level is very high and she has to stay alert and "tuned in" to everything going on around her causing her to become hyper-vigilant, hyper-alert, and/or hyper-sensitive...she is definitely not a happy child.
Feeling safe helps a happy child relax - if they can’t relax they can’t play... If they can’t play it interferes with their growth... Play is how children learn and grow along normal developmental lines.
Because feeling safe is so important, children have a built-in psychological defense mechanism called idealization which functions to help them feel safe.
Through idealization, children - not referring to teenagers here - set their parents up on a pedestal seeing them as godlike creatures... This makes them feel safe because "if I am protected by a godlike creature and then nothing can get to me" (John Bradshaw).
Of course children cannot yet think that way, but they "get it" that way in an emotional sense...a concept known as "felt-thought".
Idealization is the primary catalyst for the infection of shame...
 The emotional dependency needs are what Maslow refers to as the basic needs for love and esteem... These are the needs that nourish a happy child emotionally.
Getting these needs met fully on a consistent basis...the happy child thrives and flourishes. If these needs are not met consistently, the child suffers to an extent proportional to their lack of need fulfillment.
Pia Mellody and John Bradshaw both refer to the following as primary emotional dependency needs - Time, Attention, Affection, and Direction.

The Happy Child Needs Time

In his video Shame and Addiction, Bradshaw states... "Little kids get it that whatever their parents give their time to is what they love."
So, to a happy child... time = love.
If dad is gone working 12 to 14 hours a day - which may be his way of showing love - the kids feel that dad loves whatever he is doing more than he loves them.
They don’t understand about budgets and bills... They don’t understand that this may be dad’s way of demonstrating his love for the family.
All they know is he is usually gone. And when he comes home he is too tired to spend time with them... all he has the energy to do is rest, read the paper, and watch some TV.
The happy child gets quality time from both parents - not just one. They need enough time from each parent to get the message that they are loved as much as anyone else in the family.
It is not as much a question of quantity as it is of consistency and quality. "Quality time" is when the child’s other three primary emotional needs are also being met.

The Happy Child Needs Attention

Just as children equate time with love... they get it that:
attention = worth or value.
Attention is more than just listening to the child - it's attending to them.
Parents of a happy child:
·         Listen, try to understand, and take them seriously
·         Show genuine concern about who they are, what they think and how they feel
·         Notice when they are struggling with a feeling and help them figure out what it is and what to do about it
·         Know how their day went, who they are hanging out with, what the highlight of their week was
Happy Children get lots of attention - If they don’t get it their behavior becomes attention-seeking. This is not usually deliberate on their part...
Most of the time children really don’t know why they act in ways that are obviously designed to get attention. They are compelled to do it because they need attention - not because they want attention.
When was the last time you heard this statement... "Oh, he is just trying to get attention, just ignore him!" Sometimes this is bad advice...other times it is not.
There are two reasons kids show attention-seeking behavior:
1.       When they're not getting enough attention and genuinely need it.
2.       When they are getting too much attention - in which case it's an issue of discipline rather than attention.
Think of the latter as a request for direction or discipline-seeking behavior. Kids need direction in the form of guidance and discipline.
While ignoring certain behaviors has its place in the toolbox... it's important to provide direction when the opportunity arises - Especially if it is not an isolated incident.

The Happy Child Needs Affection

As a therapist, it's been my experience that affection is the area where many families seem to fall short. Many of my clients have told me... "Well, mine were not the most affectionate parents in the world, but I always knew they loved me".
I'm sure it's true that they were loved - However, I am also sure that kids need hugs, kisses, pats on the back, and words of encouragement on a regular basis.
To children Affection = Approval
Displays of affection are how approval messages are sent from the parent to the happy child. Affection says:
·         "I like you",
·         "I like who you are and who you are becoming",
·         "I'm glad you are my child",
·         "I'm glad I get to be your parent",
·         "I'm glad you are in this family",
·         "I'm proud of you",
·         "I Love you".
Some parents even come right out and say these things to their kids!
Affection is how the happy child gets the message that they measure up - they are approved of by those god-like creatures...
How many of us know a child who is not sure what his father thinks of him? Or one who is not sure whether she measures up to her mother’s expectations? - How many of us are still not sure if we "measure up"?
Kids who don’t get enough affection act-out their need for approval by trying to please mom or dad.
When their attempts at getting approval go unnoticed they try harder and harder to please them... this creates a deeply embedded neural network we refer to as people-pleasing.

The Happy Child Needs Direction

Children are born not knowing how to do things. They are biologically programmed to survive in the wild by crying when they have a need.
However, everything else about how to live in society must be learned, including how to do relationships, how to behave in public, how to control our impulses, etc. A happy child has available & approachable parents who gives them direction and teach them these things.

Guidance = Competence.

Our caretakers are our teachers. Dad shows us what it means to be a man in the world... mom shows us what it means to be a woman... and together they show us how men and women get along with each other.
In other words, our cultural and interpersonal neural networks come through the modeling of our parents, whether they realize it or not...this is why the "do as I say, not as I do" approach to guidance and discipline doesn't work.
In the ideal situation, parents do realize the powerful influence their behavior has on the development of their happy child. They also know that to be good teachers they have to be available and approachable - i.e., the happy child knows when and where to find dad or mom and they know that it is okay to go to them for advice and assistance.
To be available goes back to the issues of time and attention, parents must make the time to attend to the questions of their kids.
To be approachable they must also be patient, tolerant, and affectionate. Good teachers understand that kids need repetition to learn - that's how our neural networks are formed - They have to ask and be shown more than once in order to develop competence at a certain task.
A sense of competence and mastery are critical to the development of a happy child’s sense of self.
For instance, when a parent teaches a child to ride a bike they hold on, hold on, and hold on until the child gets her balance and then they let go... Usually the child will crash a time or two but soon they take off and ride.
Did you ever see a child take off on a bike for the first time? They light up like a Christmas tree and almost universally shout the same thing... “Look at me! I’m doing it!” - talk about a happy child!
The "I can do it!!" is a statement of competence and provides a huge boost to their ego. After a while you might hear the same child shout "Look at me! I’m doing it with no hands!" This shows that the happy child now has a sense of mastery...and maybe a bit too much courage.
Do you ever wonder why kids do the same thing over and over again once they become proficient at it and avoid things they might not do well? Satisfying the need for a sense of competence and mastery is the reason.
The happy child gets as many I-can-do-it experiences as we can give him or her... Things like tying their shoe for the first time, driving a car, going on a date, learning to dance, getting good grades, learning to cook, hitting a baseball, etc.
The more networks they feel competent in the better! It's like a snowball rolling downhill... they eventually reach a point that they have started an "I can do it" neural net - when that happens they are set for life.
Approachable teachers help without resorting to shameful criticism when raising a happy child. It is truly an art, and most of us where raised on shamming criticism so it is difficult to learn.
Healthy critical feedback comes with love, tolerance, and without shame. For example, healthy criticism might sound like this: "I know it’s difficult"... "You are really doing very well...I fell off more than this when I was your age." ... "I know you can do it, let’s try one more time for today."
Shameful criticism sounds like this… "Oh come on, don’t be a big baby!" "You always make things more difficult than they should be." "Your brother took off on his first try... are you going let him make you look bad?"
One other issue regarding guidance is over-protection. There are some families that have rigid, sometimes extremely over-controlling rules designed to "protect" the child...
For example, "the training wheels don’t come off until you are twelve years old", "you are not allowed to climb trees", "you can go outside but don’t do anything", and "you must wear a football helmet if you are going to get on the swing set".
The over-protective parent also does everything for the child... even that which the child should be able to do for themselves.
Over-protection and over-involvement is a result of a parent’s inability to tolerate any chance that their child might get hurt physically or emotionally - by failure or disappointment.
Over-protection can easily be mistaken for love, when in fact it is not... It's more about the parent’s need to feel safe than it is about the child’s need.
The child not only misses out on the I-can-do-it experiences but also gets a message from the god-like creatures in his life that they "can’t do it" – a network of incompetence may result.
The over-protected child may feel "If mom and dad don’t think I can do it... then I must not be able to do it." A neural network of incompetence comes with indecision and feelings of shame, fear, and anxiety.
Discipline is the second form of direction needed for a happy child...

Discipline = Character

Children are born without the internal structures to control their own impulses. Therefore, they were given external structures, called parents, to help them.
When parents set limits for their children they are telling them "Here's the line, if you step over it this is what happens".
Setting and enforcing good limits helps develop the internal structures necessary for children to control their own impulses. These structures build character.
Character consists of two primary internal structures - values... the knowledge of right and wrong, and self-discipline... the ability to delay or deny gratification of impulses based upon that knowledge.
If we remember a simple formula, A = B, then we will have quite a bit of knowledge about setting good limits.
Simply put, when our behavior (A) is a good thing, then the outcome (B) should also be a good thing... when A is a bad thing, then B should also be a bad thing...
Consistent consequences (positive or negative) shape the behaviors - and the networks - of a happy child by reinforcing the good and dissuading the bad. While this formula is simple in theory, it is difficult in practice because this life does not always go as it "should".
Good limits are firm, effective, and consistent. Good limits (B) are also connected and proportionate to the behavior (A) - i.e. let the punishment fit the crime.
When parents set and consistently enforce good limits for their child they are teaching them an important law of the universe (A=B).
This will be extremely important to them later in their adulthood when life becomes their teacher... On the other hand, when we are inconsistent with the limits, or they are inappropriate for the behavior, then we are doing our children a huge disservice.
For instance, when a teenager does "A" (comes home smelling of alcohol) and they should receive "B" (grounded for a certain period of time) but the parent feels sorry for them because the prom is this weekend so they provide "C" (Letting them off the hook and giving them $50 to have a good time)...
Then the message sent and received is A=C... In other words, "If I screw up when it really counts, mom and dad will bail me out". Providing "C" when "B" should follow interferes with the grand design enabling problem behaviors to persist...that's why its called enabling.
Decisions about good limits are not always easy. Some limits must be nonnegotiable, e.g. those related to the safety of the child and those connected with strongly held family values.
Others can be structured to teach the child flexibility and how to compromise or negotiate.
For example, when the child does "A" (breaks curfew by 30 minutes for the first time ever) and the agreed upon consequence is be "B" (grounded for the next two weekends) the negotiated agreement might be that the child can choose which two weekends of the next month to be grounded.
Another word for limits is boundaries. When parents set and consistently enforce limits they are helping their child learn healthy boundaries - Children who don’t know where the boundaries are feel unsafe.
For instance spoiled-child syndrome is what results when a child is given blanket approval for everything he or she does. When there are little or no consequences provided for these children they push the limits and push the limits until someone steps in and says "no"!
Misbehavior in this case is discipline-seeking behavior - the child is subconsciously compelled to make someone step in because they need help controlling their impulses and they are compelled to get it.
Just as in over-protection... the well-meaning intentions of the over-indulgent parent backfires.
Usually the parent is trying very hard not to hurt the child’s self-esteem with criticism so they rarely provide this form of protection.
The child may get the message that the god-like creatures in their life have no expectations of them because they are not capable of living up to them - incompetence.
Other forms of discipline include the ones that mom and dad model for us in their own daily behavior including good manners, good hygiene, good work ethic, etc. We watch and learn from them.
The old adage "do as I say, not as I do" is not very effective in helping our kids develop and internalize these daily disciplines. The most effective tool in teaching kids is good role-modeling. Limits and consequences simply reinforce what we demonstrate.